Monday, September 5, 2022

The Spider-Man Movies (part 2)

 

The Spider-Man Movies (part 1)


The Amazing Spider-Man (2012)

The Buildup: 

After Spider-Man 3 was panned by fans and critics, the Webslinger gets rebooted less than 5 years later so that Sony can maintain the rights. It promised to right the wrongs of the past trilogy and give our hero a fresh start.

The Plot: 

After being abandoned at his aunt and uncle’s house as a young child, Peter Parker has always wondered about the mysterious circumstances of his parents’ disappearance. He sneaks into Oscorp to find answers and is bitten by a genetically modified spider, giving him powers. He later witnesses his uncle get killed by a thief. He uses his powers to try and track the thief down but is ultimately unsuccessful, and decides to turn his skills to preventing other crime. Meanwhile, Kurt Connors is developing a limb regeneration technology and is given the missing algorithm by Peter using his father’s notes. Dr. Connors turns into the Lizard, and seeks to implement his evolutionary cure to the entirety of New York City.


What went right: 

Mostly all the stuff that the Raimi movies got wrong, like using mechanical web shooters instead of organic webbing. Spider-Man was a lot more lively and funny when in the costume and seemed more similar to his comic book version. Updated elements like Spider-Man playing on his phone while sitting on the web in the sewer were nice. Starting his love life with Gwen Stacy (who is played fantastically by Emma Stone), and seeing a new villain (also well-acted by Rhys Ifans). I also like how they stuck to Peter being in high school and didn’t jump ahead to adulthood. The costume was pretty good, and because they didn’t use the raised rubber it didn’t look silver colored, but the webbing pattern looked more like a wire-frame model and didn’t have the traditional “scoop” shape to it.

What went wrong: 

Peter was a little too angsty and focused on the mystery of his parents’ death, which was never emphasized in the original source materials. On the other hand, he wasn’t as nerdy or unpopular as he should have been (specifically the scenes with Flash being a bully and the basketball practice). Aunt May and Uncle Ben were okay but not as good as they were in the Raimi movies, and they tried to say Uncle Ben’s famous line without actually saying it. There was also a distinct lack of J. Jonah Jameson, but to be fair, it would be hard to follow up J.K. Simmons' amazing performance, which is why the MCU version is also played by Simmons. 

What I would have changed:

While it was intentionally different from the first trilogy (to avoid as many retread comparisons as possible), about the only things I could think of is to do some stuff more like the Raimi movies. I honestly liked this movie only just a little bit less than the first Spider-Man movie, despite having the various plot elements changed (like the focus on his parents). Though it was a reboot (which felt really early since not a lot of time had passed between Spider-Man 3 and this) and all the effort going into making this movie distinct from the Raimi trilogy, all things considered it was pretty good. I do feel like if we could have chosen about 80% from the Raimi movies and 20% from this movie and frankensteined it together, we would have made the perfect Spider-Man movie.

 

 

  




The Amazing Spider-Man 2 (2014)

The Buildup: 

After keeping the rights alive by releasing a new Spider-Man movie reboot, Sony is looking to keep the momentum and build something similar to what Marvel was starting to pull off with the MCU. A few new cast additions like Paul Giamotti and Jamie Foxx, as well as characters like Harry Osborn making an appearance had fans excited.

The Plot: 

Peter continues the case concerning his parents’ disappearance while dealing with being a high school student and juggling his responsibilities as Spider-Man. Harry Osborn starts to fall ill with a genetic disease, and it’s determined that Spider-Man’s blood may save him. Peter’s refusal angers Harry, who uses his father’s research and equipment to become the Green Goblin. Meanwhile, an Oscorp employee falls into a tank of electric eels being used for research and acquires electricity-based powers. Both villains team up to take out Spider-Man, but after Electro is stopped, Harry drops Gwen from a tower and Peter is unable to save her.

What went right: 

The suit was improved with the big white eyes, and the blue was a bit brighter. Seeing Gwen’s death done right was both exciting and unexpected.


What went wrong: 

Sony was competing with the MCU and tried to set up their own little Spider-verse here, and there was waaaay too much focus on that and not enough on the main plot concerning Spider-Man. Some of the plot elements, like Spider-Man’s blood being the cure for Harry, were not well thought out. Electro’s portrayal seemed on par with Riddler’s from Batman Forever. The way they turned Rhino into (essentially) an Iron Man suit tank was just silly. It seems like this movie fell into the same trap that Iron Man 3, X-Men 3, Spider-Man 3, and Blade 3 all fell into with trying to do too much in a movie by combining two disparate stories together into one narrative.

What I would have changed: 

Mainly focused only on one villain, so I would have gone with Electro since we’d already seen two versions of the Goblin in the Raimi films, and save him for the third movie (assuming one got made). And with only one villain, there is now adequate screen time to fully develop the character and make the origin less silly and more believable. That said, if Gwen’s death was still in the movie, I would have had Captain Stacy’s subtle ghost behind Peter as he is mourning over Gwen’s grave to hammer in the guilt just a bit harder. I also would have taken out Paul Giamotti’s role entirely.

No comments:

Post a Comment