Sunday, July 31, 2022

Movies Within Movies

 Movies within Movies


I really dislike the trope of showing movies (or TV shows) within other movies generally, but especially when it's used in one specific way - namely, using it to communicate to the audience directly what the director is trying emulate (usually badly). It seems like a cop-out or shortcut to just show another movie that did it better and is well known for that particular theme to let the audience know what's being attempted here. 


In Logan, about halfway through the movie, Xavier and Laura are watching Shane on TV in a hotel. Instead of making a subtle reference, like having a DVD copy of the movie somewhere in the scene, the movie actually zooms in and lets us watch a couple minutes of Shane, and Xavier even comments to Laura about it. This is the director hitting the audience over the head with a cartoonishly-large mallet saying, "Hey everyone, we're clearly doing Shane: Mutant Edition here." For the same reason, I also bristled at the part when Logan takes the X-Men comic books out of Laura's backpack. 


It would be the same if in the first 10 minutes of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's/Philosopher's Stone it showed him watching Star Wars: A New Hope (see the linked image for how similar these movies are) to let the audience know that Harry is going on a similar journey to Luke Skywalker. Galaxy Quest wouldn't be nearly as good if there were episodes of Star Trek playing somewhere in the background for the same reason. 


In the dumpster fire that was The New Mutants, there's a shot of the rec-room where an episode of Buffy the Vampire Slayer is playing, specifically during a scene where Tara and Willow are kissing, and it's being watched by one of the girls who would later turn out to have a romantic entanglement with the main girl. It's really not clever or subtle, and they use Buffy again (my favorite episode, no less) as another blunt object to let us know what's about to happen instead of using, you know, good foreshadowing. 



I can somewhat forgive a little lampshading for comedic effect. 
Spider-Man running through backyards commenting on a movie someone was watching was a funny reference to Ferris Bueller's Day Off, but I'm sure it was lost on people who hadn't seen the movie in years (and whose cinema memory isn't nearly as attuned as mine) or are too young to have seen it in the first place. Showing someone watching it while Peter is doing the exact same thing not only lets the audience know what the homage is, but also adds to his trait of making movie references (to Empire Strikes Back and Alien in other MCU films letting the audience know that the director is fully aware they're pulling the same gag previously done by George Lucas and Ridley Scott). It straddles the border between homage and lampshading, but I let it slide if done with enough humor/reverance. 


The same could be said for how A Fistful of Dollars was used in Back to the Future 2 & 3. Marty saw Biff watching the movie in the hot tub, and then in the sequel chooses to use Clint Eastwood's name and armors himself in a similar fashion. Marty was able to recall this idea since having seen that part of the movie just days earlier (from his POV). Given that the movies were released nearly a year apart, I can see the argument for it being some foreshadowing in the second movie for a payoff in the third one. 


Movies like Deadpool can get away with it because of the whole breaking the fourth wall thing and his hyper-awareness, or something like Spaceballs watching itself, but overall for most movies I would prefer the references and allusions to be more subtle. 

There are, however, three perfectly acceptable uses in my opinion. 

1) Establishing time period. If you show kids watching Howdie Doodie, it lets you know they're in the 50's, or someone watching Buffy is probably in the 90's. Movie directors have to  visually communicate things to audiences quickly without having a 15-minute "who's who" narrated prologue, so visual clues are often used. Like if a husband comes home from work in a truck, is wearing flannel, jeans and a hard hat, it's obvious he's a construction worker. Likewise, seeing someone wearing John Lennon glasses and bell bottoms while driving a VW bus would give some clues as to when the movie is taking place, and sometimes what happens to be on the TV in the background can serve the same purpose. 


2)
 If the movie isn't a real movie, like Angels with Filthy Souls in Home Alone. It's mainly establishing that the movie was violent and not age appropriate for Kevin but by the end of the week he had grown up enough to laugh maniacally with it. Kevin watching something like Die Hard would have been a bit too on the nose. This sort of thing is used in plenty of movies and shows. 


3) When the content of the show isn't integral to the story. There are plenty of films and shows that show a father, who just got off work, relaxing in the den watching a baseball game (or whatever). The exact sport and the particular game's outcome isn't important to the story, per se, but it's just in there to establish that he's in leisure mode or a sports fan of some sort. Another example is when Dr. House is watching General Hospital (or some parody thereof). While it may show a line or two, what's happening on the fake soap opera isn't fundamental to the plot - it's just showing that Dr. House is actively avoiding clinic duty or some other occupational obligation, and is no different than when he was playing Metroid Zero Mission on a Gameboy Advance. 

I think occasionally it can be done right, especially if it's very clever and subtle, but most of the time it's one of those things that can somewhat break my suspension of disbelief and I wish directors wouldn't take such shortcuts. 

Note: this post is mainly referring to times when the movie/show is specifically emphasized and/or part of the plot, and not just incidentally in the scene. 




Wednesday, July 27, 2022

Grab-bag Post #4

 

Grab-bag Post #1

Grab-bag Post #2

Grab-bag Post #3

 

Why physical games are better

Whenever possible, I get physical versions of games. As convenient as it is to have a ton of games all on one microSD card, I prefer to have physical copies of games. Now that I have 3 different Switch consoles (OG, OLED, and Lite), I don’t want to pay $20 to download Portal onto each one or mess with account sharing. By contrast, I can pop my Metroid Dread gamecard into any of them and play without problems, and also let my kids play the game on their Switch as well. Another reason is that there have been times when publishers retract games that have been paid for on certain platforms or the shop just gets taken down entirely (this has also happened with digitally bought music and movies). If I have a physical copy, Nintendo can’t stop me from playing the game even if it gets pulled from the digital store, and they can’t barge into my house to take the game back.

I also tend to avoid games whose main draw is the multiplayer aspect of it. Once that server goes down and the ability to play multiplayer goes with it, the game loses all value and interest (see various versions of Call of Duty). Meanwhile, if the single-player game is the main focus, when the multiplayer gets taken away most people don’t notice (see Phantom Hourglass, for example). This is similar to why I also strongly dislike the, “games as a service,” model, since the games can’t be preserved for future generations unless someone also makes a fan server, which only happens to the biggest games.

It also goes for physical games which require many gigabytes of updates to make it playable. 


 

Being a hardware minimalist

This is a little expansion of something I mentioned on the Collecting post, but I have usually been a hardware minimalist for the most part. And what I mean by that is my priority has always been about being able to play the games themselves. When the SNES was announced, I knew I needed the new hardware to play the new games. By contrast, when the Game Boy Pocket or Switch Lite was announced, I didn’t see the need because they were just smaller. When I got the Game Boy Advance, I knew I could play any original GB game, GBC game, or GBA game on this device. Even though the SP added a backlight, it didn’t allow me to play anything I couldn’t already play on the original model. I skipped the DS and DSi and re-entered with the 3DS, but that allowed me access to all previous DS and DSi games up through that point. So in theory, I could have played any Nintendo handheld game ever made and I was happy with that (until I got the idea to get one of everything).

Obviously this doesn’t apply to the home consoles as much, as there are fewer revisions, but I didn’t feel the need to get a SNES Jr, or a Wii Mini because they didn’t allow me to play any new games.  

 

 Collector's Editions 

In a similar vein to being a hardware minimalist, I usually don’t go for extra bells and whistles when games are released. Some games have Special Editions that include a book, a map, a carrying case, a steel gamecase, or some other collectible. I just want to play the game, and don’t need the extra junk, especially if it’s some kind of guidebook, because I prefer to discover things for myself. But I can see the appeal to people who like those sorts of things. I did buy the collector’s edition of Twilight Princess HD because it came with the Wolf Link amiibo, but only because 1) I hadn’t yet discovered NFC-215 tags yet, 2) it was supposed to unlock new content for both TPHD and BotW, and 3) it was Zelda stuff. The same goes with movies that used to have special editions. I remember kinda wanting the $80 Lord of the Rings Extended Edition sets for the extra junk, but ultimately I just wanted the movies and the other stuff would probably be collecting dust in a cabinet.

 

 Pop Culture Loss

I suppose this might fit better on the Evolution of Gaming series, but I don’t have enough to say to warrant its own post.

There are both positive and negative aspects to the various facets of progress, but one I’ve noticed is that with a lot more choice comes a loss of connected pop culture. Back when I was a kid, (insert uphill both ways joke here) most people had the same console (NES), and then later one of two options (SNES or Genesis). Because of that, it was almost always possible to find someone to trade games with, and at some point we all kinda played each other’s games so we could all share in a common experience. Likewise, with only 4 real TV channels (and PBS), we could all talk about a lot of the same shows.

But I fear that these days we have lost the major aspect of pop culture – that being popularity, by which I mean seen/played by a good majority of the people. When it comes to TV, due to different cable packages or streaming services, someone might have a completely different set of shows they watch than their friend, and so they have less in common. The same might go for someone who owns a Playstation and a Nintendo console with a friend who does only PC gaming. Plus, in both cases there is now so much content and so many games that it would be impossible to keep up on all of them. With a lot of streaming shows, we never know if our friends are “caught up” or if they’re waiting for the season (or series) to end and to binge it all at once, and it can somewhat stifle conversations at work/school that would normally bring us together after having had a common experience in order to avoid spoilers.



Tuesday, July 26, 2022

The X-Men Movies (Part 4 - Deadpool/Phoenix Trilogy)

The X-Men Movies (Part 1 - Original Trilogy)

The X-Men Movies (Part 2 - Prequel Trilogy)

The X-Men Movies (Part 3 - Wolverine Trilogy)



Deadpool (2016)

The Buildup: 

After years of being denied a second chance at the role, Ryan Reynolds “leaked” some test footage onto the internet once Tom Rothman was gone from Fox. He and the director arranged to get a small amount of funding to make this happen, and it looked like it was going to be almost perfectly comic accurate. The movie was releasing on Valentine’s Day, so some of the ad campaign made it seem like a love story so men could get their unaware girlfriends into the theater. Another side of the ad campaign were videos about testicular cancer checks from Deadpool on YouTube.

The Plot: 

Wade Wilson is a smalltime mercenary who falls in love with Vanessa before finding out he has cancer. In an effort to save his loved ones the pain of seeing him die, he opts for an experimental treatment that turns out to be a operation that makes mutant soldiers sold as slaves. In the process he gains phenomenal healing and regenerative abilities but is left permanently scarred. Taking the name Deadpool, he works his way through the criminal underworld to get revenge on the people who transformed him and kidnapped his girl.

 What went right:

Just about everything. Deadpool was perfect in this. It exactly encapsulated the character, his antics, fourth-wall breaking, and inability to shut up. The story wasn’t anything groundbreaking, but it didn’t need to be – a simple revenge story mixed in with a love and kidnapping subplot was plenty. Plus, Wade and Vanessa had great chemistry together.

We got to see Blind Alfred, Vanessa (Copycat), and a comics accurate Colossus (finally). Negasonic Teenage Warhead was changed from the comics version of a telepath and precog to be closer to something like Cannonball. Gina Carano was a brilliant choice for Angeldust, as it was very believable that she knew how to throw a punch.

There were plenty of jokes poking fun at the Fox producers, Reynolds' past role of Green Lantern, how terrible Deadpool was in X-Men Origins: Wolverine, the confusing X-Men timeline, etc.


What went wrong:

A few jokes didn’t land as well as they could have, and some of the funniest bits were kinda spoiled in the trailer.



What I would have changed:

Not a damn thing.

 

 


Deadpool 2 (2018)

The Buildup: 

Deadpool is back and he’s got some new friends this time, as well as a bigger budget since the first movie was so profitable. Deadpool took over Blu-ray releases, as all of the cardboard slipcovers were replaced with Deadpool versions of basically every Fox-produced film at stores like Wal-Mart. Fans of the first movie know what to expect so there wasn’t a fakeout campaign, though there was a PG-13 re-release where Deadpool read the story of Deadpool 2 to an adult Fred Savage in a recreated bedroom set from The Princess Bride with the proceeds going to cancer research.

The Plot: 

After a job goes badly, Vanessa is killed in a revenge hit, sending Wade in a spiral and he ends up being an X-Men trainee after attempting suicide. Meanwhile in the future, Cable’s family is also killed by a fire-powered super villain, so he uses a time-travel device to return to the present to take the bad guy out while he’s still a kid. Wade ends up attempting to save the kid from Cable, while teaming up with Domino, Colossus, and Negasonic before finding out who the real villain is.

 What went right: 

Mostly everything again. More fourth-wall breaking, referencing the Logan movie's success, and poking fun at the Origins: Wolverine movie. Seeing the Juggernaut and Cable done properly.


What went wrong:
 

The movie had a few more jokes that didn’t land than the first one. Due to the plot being about Vanessa’s death, she had very little screen time despite being one of the bright spots of the first film.



What I would have changed:

Cut the budget by a few million and see if it turns out better. I somewhat feel like the budgetary constraints the first movie had forced the director/writer/Reynolds to be more creative, and with an increase in budget a commensurate increase in quality wasn't there. 

 

 


Dark Phoenix (2019)
and The New Mutants (2020)

The Buildup:

I went in to Dark Phoenix expecting a train wreck, and I got it. The only reason we went was because we were meeting family in Vegas on the weekend it released and we had 4 hours to kill before checking in to the hotel, and there was air conditioning in the theater. I watched New Mutants once at home after downloading it, because it kept getting delayed because of Covid, the Disney/Fox merger, and reshoots. 



The Plot:

Don’t Care. I couldn't tell you what happened despite having watched it. Didn't even buy it on DVD. 

What went right:

There's always a new character to see on screen. 

What went wrong:

A lot. 

What I would have changed:

Like Apocalypse, I just would not have made either movie, period.




The Wrap Up

The X-Men franchise is about half and half when it comes to good, quality superhero movies. I'm glad that they were able to enter the scene and pave the way for Spider-Man and the MCU movies, and I'm happy that when I refer to something from the X-Men in conversation there's a decent chance the person will know what I'm talking about, which wasn't the case when I was in high school. But I would rather them have made fewer movies that were good than more that are mediocre. If we just excise Apocalypse, Dark Phoenix, and New Mutants from the onscreen canon, then what we see is only a couple of bad movies (X3 and Origins) whose problems were eventually fixed with time travel in Days of Future Past

As much as I have always been a little pessimistic about Fox's handling of the franchise, I'm not super optimistic about it being in the hands of Disney at the moment. For now, I just hope they give it a rest and let people absorb what's come so far before shoving more down their throats and giving everyone superhero fatigue from bad movies. 





The X-Men Movies (Part 3 - Wolverine Trilogy)






X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)

The Buildup: 

After the financial success of three X-Men films, and critical success on two of them, Fox was set to milk this franchise by producing origin story movies for some of the more popular characters like Magneto, Xavier, and Logan. This was touted to be the first in the spin-off series of movie designed to flesh out the stories told in the main trilogy. 



The Plot: 

Witnessing his father being killed, James Howlett discovers he’s a mutant with bone claws. He and his half-brother run away from home and serve in all the major US wars from Civil to Vietnam when they are recruited to a Special Forces team. Wolverine leaves the team and tries to live a normal life but when his brother and past come back to haunt him, he volunteers for a procedure that will give him an adamantium skeleton. He spends the rest of his time getting revenge for what happened to him, ultimately leading to the loss of his memory.
 
What went right: 

It started off seeming to follow his origin which had been recently revealed in the pages of Marvel Comics, and had an epic opening scene for the various wars.

Working The 3-Mile Island incident into the origin kinda fits in with the other movies in the way that they worked the Holocaust, JFK Assassination, and Cuban Missile Crisis into the plots.
Several major character origin plot points were shown in earnest and not just in flashback form.


What went wrong:

12-yr-old James could have had his first rage onset be a bit better scripted/directed. Wade’s faster-than-Jedi propeller sword slinging and Maverick (Agent Zero’s) backflip didn’t just push the bounds of believability – it stepped right over the line into ridiculousness territory. The Native American wolverine/moon story (Kuekuatsheu) was a little too on the nose, and it’s actually about a wolf, not a wolverine. The movie kinda shied away from connecting Victor to the Sabretooth from the first movie, even though comic fans knew. An explanation for why Victor became Sabretooth (like a memory wipe) would have been nice.

In the same way that we didn’t need an origin for Han Solo’s blaster or Chewie’s bandolier, we also didn’t need one for Logan’s dogtags, especially since it implies that they made them while he’s just waiting there in the water. Same goes for his jacket. Naming the old lady Heather Hudson was a bad attempt at fanservice/easter egg because it didn’t fit with the comics, and we would only know her name if we read the credits.

Weapon X as being the Roman number 10 had been a recent thing in the comics and it immediately became movie lore. Same goes for Emma Frost and her diamond skin thing.
Stryker’s facility doesn’t resemble the Alkali Lake set from X2 very much, and somehow, the claws looked worse than the past 3 movies. It seemed like the producers tried to cram almost every action movie cliché into this one – Zero’s backflip, motorcycle escape out of exploding barn, claws to do a 180, Zero’s jump into the helicopter, jump to kill helicopter in slow motion, lighting the trail of gasoline and walking away from the explosion without looking, the jump punch to knock out Blob, and so on.

The fight with Gambit was only in the movie because the pacing guide for the script dictated it in the same way that Jon Peters said there needs to be an action scene every 10 pages (or whatever), and it became Crouching Cajun, Hidden Cardshark during the fight with his “telecardnesis” and “stick climbing” abilities.

Making Emma Frost sisters with Silverfox is just lore breaking and mind bogglingly stupid and inconsistent with comics and future movies, and Xavier walking makes some inconsistencies with future films, and there’s not really a reason to entangle Cyclops into the story – we can have Wolverine’s origin and not include everyone from the roster.

Blob was never part of the Weapon X team (I realize this is a change from the comics and that’s not necessarily a bad thing but it feels like they included him just to include him), meanwhile Silverfox (Kayla) should have been on the team.

Deadpool was really done dirty in this film. They had the perfect actor to play him and they squandered it in the worst way possible. And having 10 powers combined was just a stupid idea to begin with. That said, if DINO (Deadpool-in-name-only) had Cyclops’ powers, adamantium claws shouldn’t have been able to stop the beams, even if the director/producer thought they were heat blasts instead of concussive blasts.

An adamantium bullet as mind-wiper was just a very, very dumb way to set up Logan’s amnesia and contradicts his X-ray in the first film which didn’t show 2 bullet-holes.   
 
What I would have changed:

I would have just adapted the Weapon X story from Marvel Comics Presents in the early 80’s along with the James Howlett stuff that had recently been printed which inspired the first 8 minutes of the movie. There was already a great story there – I don’t see why they had to just make new shit up for no reason.
 
 
 
 
 


The Wolverine (2013)

The Buildup: 

After a couple of disappointing films, the X-Men franchise scored a hit with First Class, and now they’re going back to the well of the most popular character to try another solo movie.




The Plot: 

After being forced to kill Jean, Logan has become a recluse in the woods and vows to not hurt anyone else. He sees flashbacks of his time saving Yashida’s life during the Nagasaki bombing, as well as hallucinating conversations with Jean. He is taken to Japan to bid farewell to a now aged and cancerous Yashida, and charged with protecting his granddaughter Mariko. The Yakuza stage a kidnapping at the funeral, forcing Mariko and Logan to run and hide while his healing powers have strangely disappeared, and it all smells of a sinister plot involving Yashida.

 What went right:

Setting most of the movie in Japan. Hugh Jackman looks even better as Wolverine this time around, and he gets to kick plenty of ass (in a PG-13 manner) while taking in the Japanese culture/scenery. We got to see Mariko and the Silver Samurai, which were important characters to Logan in the comics.


What went wrong:

Viper’s acting is a tad on the cheesy melodramatic side that would fit well in a CW show, but not a major movie like this.

The last act of the movie was a bit cliché with the whole using Mariko as bait in a trap. After two acts that had some good writing, it felt like they gave up and just resorted to typical 80’s action movie fare.

The Silver Samurai as a giant "Iron Man" suit specifically designed to cut off and drill out Logan’s claws was a bit contrived, as was the magical sword that required two hands to work for some reason.
 
What I would have changed:

Let Harada be the Silver Samurai instead of Yashida, and followed the story of the original comics a little more closely. Make Shingen the main villain. Not that the movies need to reproduce every beat and line from the comics – it can be modernized and a few details changed around. But build the story around the established characters using the original story as a framework and alter it to fit within the movie continuity.  



Logan (2017)


The Buildup:

On the heels of The Wolverine, Days of Future Past, and Deadpool, it appeared that the X-Men franchise was experiencing a bit of an upswing in quality. This was touted as the first R-rated Wolverine movie, so expectations were high to see some better action.



The Plot:

In a world where mutants are increasingly rare, Logan is earning money as a limo driver while taking care of an aging Xavier and aided by the mutant tracker Caliban. The plan is to live on a boat away from society so as to not let Xavier’s powers hurt people, and Logan only needs a bit more money to make it happen. He takes on a job to drive a woman and young mutant girl to Canada, but gets involved with some dangerous people who want the girl, who also has claws. Logan helps get the girl to her safe haven in Canada, losing friends and himself along the way.

What went right:

The girl who plays Laura absolutely nails her role and is terrifyingly fierce as a young female Wolverine clone. The action is far more realistic because they didn’t have to stick to a PG-13 level. Hugh Jackman’s acting was on point for both his rage and his pain and suffering.

As usual, we got to see a few new faces, such as Rictor, the Reavers, and Donald Pierce. Whereas Origins: Wolverine movie was about 1/3 good, and The Wolverine was about 2/3 good, this movie was excellent the whole way through.


What went wrong:

While I like the concept of the Old Man Logan story, he shouldn’t suddenly be aging and catching up to Xavier so quickly, and Xavier should be a bit older for the timeline to make sense.

I kinda disliked the X-Men comics appearing in the X-Men film, as it’s a bit too on the nose for my taste. It would be like making a comic book over the Johnny Depp/Amber Turd trial. I also somewhat dislike when movies include other movies or TV shows whose themes are similar for the same reason.

What I would have changed:

While I liked Stewart’s performance in this, I would have eliminated Xavier from the story completely. It’s just weird to think that one of the last two X-Men alive would be Xavier, given his age. If anyone, it would be Logan and Cable. But I think there could have been enough story with just Logan and Laura on the run without Xavier. Cutting him out of the story would just necessitate a few small changes to why Logan was working as a driver. 




The X-Men Movies (Part 4 - Deadpool/Phoenix Trilogy)

Monday, July 25, 2022

The X-Men Movies (Part 2 - Prequel Trilogy)





X-Men: First Class (2011)

 
The Buildup: 

After two movies that weren’t regarded very highly, this new release was intended as a do-over and a prequel, showing the origins of how the X-Men were formed in the first place. It's widely believed that many of the ideas that were going to be used in an X-Men Origins: Magneto movie that was never made were recycled here and added more elements of Xavier's origin to the mix. 



The Plot: 

Charles Xavier and his adopted sister are recruited by the CIA to help them deal with some mutant problems they have been having. They uncover a plot to send the world into a war, orchestrated by an ex-Nazi scientist. Xavier and his new friend Eric gather a team of mutants to prevent this from happening, but Eric’s desire for revenge and mutant superiority fractures the team and results in Charles losing the use of his legs as well as losing his sister’s loyalty.
 
What went right: 

This movie was overall very good, with some very accomplished actors giving great performances. We got more Beast and his backstory (which was similar to the comic origins), and how central he was to the technology of the X-Men, including suits and jets. We also get some more characters new to the movie universe, namely Havok, Banshee, Azazel, Angel Salvadore, and others. But the main focus is on Magneto’s origin and the formation of his friendship with Xavier.

The X-Men uniforms are comics accurate, though they’re intended as flight suits with some added tech for Havok and Banshee, and there’s also a comics accurate Magneto helmet. Wolverine’s cameo is particularly good.

The history of the X-Men is worked into the Cuban Missile Crisis, just as it had been with the Holocaust and Three-Mile Island incident in previous films. The story is compelling, and the writing is excellent, and it shows how Xavier was paralyzed by a stray bullet.

 

What went wrong: 

The Xavier and Eric recruitment scene contradicts a similar one in X3 when they visit the Grey household (unless it’s implied that Magneto is an on-again/off-again comrade). In fact, there are several continuity-breaking details, such as Xavier’s paralysis pre-dating his visit to a young Jean Grey or rescue of Cyclops from Stryker, and the Emma Frost in this movie can’t also be the Emma Frost that was Kayla’s younger sister from Origins: Wolverine.

Speaking of Emma, January Jones was a dreadful choice for Emma Frost. While she is easy on the eyes and can be dressed up to look the part, she is a terrible actress and recites her lines while tilting her head and blinking like a typical dumb blonde. I’m still not in love with the decision from the comics to have secondary mutations (making Beast more lion-like and Emma’s diamond ability), and it makes it worse with the diamond mental shield she can cast around Shaw.

This new story makes Havok an earlier student of Xavier’s than Cyclops, who had always been the first student in the comics. I know the movies don’t have to follow the comics exactly, but it would be like retelling American history and making Thomas Jefferson the first president or something.

The bullet being the reason for Xavier’s paralysis was more grounded than a psychic battle with Lucifer or the Shadow King, but directly contradicts scenes in both X-Men Origins: Wolverine and X3 which show a much older Xavier walking.

Making Prof and Mystique siblings was an interesting choice (seeing how it was never mentioned in any of the movies thus far). While Xavier and Mystique never interact directly in the original trilogy, he did see her with Magneto while reading Senator Kelly’s mind, and might have mentioned that his adopted sister was helping or something.  


What I would have changed: 

Making Moira an American CIA agent instead of Scottish geneticist was an odd choice, and seemed like they just took a pre-made script and changed the character names to ones from the comics. I would have picked Valerie Cooper instead, as she was actually a government agent.  

Beast being able to run so fast and lap Xavier during training was kinda unnecessary – he’s not Quicksilver. It should have been something besides running, like maybe climbing or parkour.  
 
 

 
 

X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)


The Buildup: 

After a reboot of the continuity and a successful Wolverine movie, this one was going to tie it all together. In addition, the title and main plot points come from one of the most well-beloved and highly regarded story from the X-Men comics history. It also hails the return of Bryan Singer, who shepherded the X-Men onto the silver screen with the first two movies.

The Plot: 

The future is bleak where mutants are hunted to extinction by Sentinels. A small handful of X-Men avoid getting captured by mentally projecting the date and time of their deaths to their younger selves, who change locations after being warned. Once joined by the other remaining X-Men and Magneto, they do the same thing to Wolverine, sending him back to the 70’s to change one event that is the lynchpin to the development of the deadly Sentinel technology. Wolverine must change the past, while his teammates provide protection.

What went right: 

We get to see new characters like Quicksilver, Blink, Bishop, Sunspot, and Warpath, as well as Iceman’s ice slide and Magneto fighting alongside the X-Men again. The Quicksilver scene in the Pentagon was spectacularly done.

Sentinels are way scarier in this movie than they ever were in comics and cartoons. The events are once again tied into real history, including the end of the Vietnam war, the JFK assassination, and Nixon’s presidency.

They explained the rules of the time travel and why it had to be Wolverine. What's not explained, however, is how his claws are back to being adamantium after losing them in Japan. 

It fixed all of the stupid decisions made in X3 and Origins: Wolverine, and restored the timeline to how it should have been. It had both eras of X-Men movies going simultaneously. This could also be the explanation to fix why some things in First Class contradicted continuity with other movies – that this starts them on a different timeline so events happened differently, though it’s never directly addressed.



What went wrong: 

I understand why they included Kitty as the one sending people back in time (since it was she who was sent back in the comics), and why Bishop was the messenger (also a time traveler), and why it was Wolverine in the movie (he can heal and he’s also the most popular character). But what they don’t explain is how Kitty got such powers, when she could only walk through walls before.

The serum that inhibits powers also giving Xavier his legs back was a little odd. It’s not made clear how the two are connected.

What I would have changed: 

To fix the leg-restoring but power-inhibiting serum, I would have made Xavier depressed instead of a drug addict. Combine the loss of legs with the loss of students in Vietnam and that’s enough to make anyone lose hope. I know part of the arc was to have Xavier lose his way and have to find it again, including the use of his powers, but I would have said that he is so depressed that he can’t use them because he’s not in between rage and serenity (referencing what he told Magneto in First Class).

I also would not have had Stryker's eyes flash yellow after Wolverine is pulled up out of the water. It would draw a more direct line between what happened in this movie and where he ended up in Apocalypse (even if I wouldn't have made that movie). As it is, it seems like Mystique rescues him (like she did to Alex and the others in Vietnam) and Logan somehow still ends up in the Weapon X program with Stryker.

Other than that, just explain how Kitty got her new time-traveling projection powers. 




X-Men: Apocalypse (2016)


The Buildup: 

After the post-credit teaser for Days of Future Past, many comics fans were looking forward to seeing Apocalypse, one of the major and more fantastical villains from the comics. The movie being directed by Bryan Singer gave it some additional clout, as he had been involved in 4 of the 5 good X-Men movies thus far. 

The Plot:

A mutant from Ancient Egypt who was sealed in a tomb is accidentally released by Moira. He befriends Storm, learns of humanity, and declares them to have lost their way. He finds four mutants, including a reformed Magneto whose family has just been killed, and powers them up as his Horsemen. Meanwhile the X-Men get a few young recruits, and they are called upon to save the world from this existential threat when Xavier is taken by Apocalypse.

What went right: 

This movie helped bridge the gap between the First Class cast and younger versions of the  X-Men cast, making the series a little more cohesive. In particular, having Havok introducing Cyclops to Xavier helped connect the movies together (even if it bugs me that Scott is the younger brother in this continuity).

Seeing Wolverine in the Weapon X getup and 
properly kicking some more ass (PG-13 style) was satisfying as a brief cameo. James McAvoy finally allowed his head to be shaved for the finale of the movie. John Ottman once again gave us a good score. 

We get to see Storm, Nightcrawler, CIA Moira (though I still would have preferred Valerie Cooper), and Angel/Archangel again, and quite a few other small cameos. The character bits and setup from the heroes side of things isn't too bad in the first two acts, but the villain setup is rather clichéd. Overall, about half of it is pretty good but the bad parts are pretty bad. 

I think it's safe to say that Cyclops being introduced differently than how it was depicted in Origins: Wolverine is not a continuity break as everything post-DoFP should be different. However, this doesn't apply to First Class continuity errors. 

What went wrong: 

I know destroying the mansion every couple years happened in the comics, but it felt unnecessary here. And even though it was only the second time in the franchise, the Quicksilver scene felt like going to the well one too many times. The cage fight between Nightcrawler and Angel also seemed like a retread of how we first met Wolverine.

Near the end it seemed like it fell into the clichéd floating garbage rings in the sky as a way of demonstrating a world-ending event. In fact, that seemed to be Magneto's whole purpose: to throw garbage into the sky until it was the right time as determined by Apocalypse. The plot was very by-the-numbers and wasn't very inventive, even though it was loosely based on the Fall of the Mutants crossover from the comics. 

Apocalypse wasn’t nearly menacing enough - he should have been much bigger physically and the voice modulation should have been on all the time (like he was in the psychic plane). In the "real" world, he had very vague powers that seemed to be whatever the script required. Defeating him was a matter of throwing enough colored light powers at him simultaneously. Sophie Turner was not great as Jean Grey, and while Olivia Munn looked perfect for Psylocke, her acting wasn't very good nor was Storm's, which mainly consisted of grunts other than the scene of her and Apocalypse getting acquainted. 

It teased Mr. Sinister (one of my favorite villains) but just gave us blue balls because the movies never delivered on this (except for New Mutants, and the less said about that film the better). Even though they were more comics accurate, some of the costumes looked like cheap rubber foam. And there were probably one too many winks toward the audience (like Cyclops saying hoping they never run into Wolverine again, or Jean saying the third movie in a series is the worst). 

The ending teased the Phoenix story again, which I had hoped they wouldn’t touch and just leave well enough alone. I much prefer the original concept of the Phoenix (a cosmic entity that inhabits her body) and not the retconned one that has been used in the movies and recent comics. She's too overpowered at too young an age.

And while it's not as bad as Superman's "brick-building vision" from Superman IV, Jean and Magneto just putting the mansion back together like it was a Lego set is kind of silly. And they leaned in kinda hard on the dramatic entrances, slow-motion, and turns/reveals. 

What I would have changed: 

This might be controversial, but I just wouldn’t have made the movie at all. I would have just ended the X-Men series on a high note with Days of Future Past and the, “ . . . happily ever after,” ending that they showed. Honestly, even after owning the movie on Blu-Ray for several years, I still haven’t seen it since watching it in the theater until reviewing it for this post.



The X-Men Movies (Part 3 - Wolverine Trilogy)

Thursday, July 21, 2022

The X-Men Movies (Part 1 - Original Trilogy)

 

The X-Men Quadrilogy of Trilogies

While there were a few landmark pre-2000 superhero movies like the first Batman and Superman films, as well as things like Spawn and Blade, the current superhero movie craze that is currently starting to die down began in earnest with the release of X-Men, followed closely by Spider-Man. So I’m going to do a few articles about this set of movies. This is one of those projects that I started back during Phase 2 of the MCU but never completed. So now is as good of time as any. 



X-Men (2000)

The Buildup:

As I’ve mentioned before in other posts, I was out of the country and didn’t find out about the X-Men movie until literally during breakfast of the day I was heading to the airport to go back home after more than 18 months of living in Japan. While I was excited, I was also sure that it would most likely suck and I would have to justify liking it in the same manner as I did something like Condorman or Supergirl.

The marketing around it was cautious. It assumed that most people didn’t know what mutants are or who the characters were, so it very distinctly told them who the good guys and bad guys were in no uncertain terms. Outside of Patrick Stewart and Halle Berry, it didn’t look like the star-studded cast that I assumed it would have been. It took me a while to figure out that Jean was Xenia from Goldeneye, and I later learned that Toad was Darth Maul. Rebecca Romijn was somewhat known to my brothers for her notoriety in marrying Uncle Jesse and having also been in Austin Powers 2, but all of that (again) happened while I was abroad so it was totally new to me. I learned that Sabretooth was going to be played by a former pro wrestler who I’d never heard of, Rogue was someone who had been in an artsy-fartsy Oscar-winning movie in the mid-90’s as a kid, and that pretty much everyone else was unknown, so I wasn’t overly optimistic. I was particularly worried about an unknown playing Wolverine, especially since he was Australian.

But, it turns out, it didn’t suck. In fact, it was pretty good. While I would say it wasn’t a total home-run, they at least didn’t screw anything up. Outside of the uniform color changes, just about everything was a somewhat streamlined and simplified version of the story and characters from the comics and animated series. It was also a good jumping-on point for newcomers who knew nothing of the X-Men or Marvel comics.

The Plot:

The world is beginning to find out about mutants: people who were born with powers that manifest themselves at puberty. The story follows Wolverine, who seems to be wanted by a group of mutants (led by Magneto) trying to establish themselves as the dominant species on the planet. He then meets the X-Men, a group of mutants (led by Professor Xavier) who have a school to train young mutants to live in harmony with “normal” people. Magneto doesn’t want a modern-day repeat of the concentration camps of WWII with mutants and tries to mutate the world leaders. The X-Men use their abilities and technology to stop Magneto’s group from causing harm.

 


What went right:

It took the source material seriously, and didn’t shy away from code names (for the most part). It had some of the most popular characters and didn’t overdo it (meaning, it didn’t come on too strongly for normies or have required reading to understand things, nor did it have too many characters to keep track of, which is something I kinda thought might happen because there’s so many good characters to draw from).

It was made (I think) for a mostly new audience who had never heard of the X-Men before, and was able to communicate this world’s rules and mutant-related issues really well.

The change from yellow spandex to black leather was probably the biggest difference, but it was needed to help normies buy into the superhero concept and evolve it past capes and molded rubber suits. Wolverine poking fun at the names/costumes somewhat helped.

The special effects were good, and it had a nice plot twist with Magneto and Rogue, as well as the love triangle between Logan/Jean/Scott. The main villain was relatable and not just power hungry.

While most of the actors were pretty good in their roles, Patrick Stewart, Hugh Jackman, and Ian McKellen nailed their roles as Professor X, Wolverine, and Magneto respectively.  I was particularly worried about Wolverine because I heard that Jackman was Australian, so I thought they were going down the same road as Pryde of the X-Men as far as his accent/personality went.


What went wrong:

The main criticism I had of the movie at the time was that there was not enough action, and that Sabretooth and Toad aren’t “actors” as much as strong/stuntmen. The one glaring problem with some of the stunt-work  that stands out is when Toad climbs the train station walls it’s pretty obvious that he is just being pulled up a rope.

Storm’s hair/accent wasn’t great and could have used some more development time. Also, for someone with a healing factor, Wolverine spent the most time of anyone being knocked unconscious.

The flip side of appealing to normies is that it skipped over a lot of really good history and characters to start in the spot that most people wanted, meaning it didn’t begin with the five original students and somewhat follow the comics from there – it kinda spotlighted a whittled down version of the 90’s team. But I understand why it was done.

What I would have changed:

Mainly I would have fixed Storm’s hair and gotten rid of the accent, or given her a few more weeks with a dialect coach (and maybe hung out with Alison Sealy-Smith from the animated series).

I also would have changed it so that it was Jean who stopped the bullet when Magneto fired the gun outside of the train station. Then Magneto would have said, “I don’t think SHE can stop them all,” before cocking every gun.

The music was a bit subdued and conservative, so I would add a few more recognizable tracks to the score.

 

  


X2: X-Men United (2003)

The Buildup:

There was a little more excitement about this film, as this was no longer something new to most viewers and didn’t have to serve as an introduction. The superhero movie concept had been elevated since the first movie as well as the Spider-Man movie so expectations were high. The director stated that this is the film he wanted to make, but felt like the first one was kind of a 2-hour trailer for the sequel. In anticipation, X-Men 1.5 was released on DVD that had the original movie plus some extended scenes and previews for the sequel.

The Plot:

Wolverine continues to search for clues to his past, while Professor X is dealing with the aftermath of Magneto’s plot from the first movie. Colonel William Stryker has declared war on mutants and uses any means necessary to eradicate them. The X-Men find themselves temporarily homeless, leaderless, and in the precarious position of having to team up with their enemies for the common good.

What went right:

It picked up the story a few months after the first one ended and seemed like a genuine continuation, and all main actors stayed in their roles (only notable changes were Kitty, Jubilee, and Pyro), with a few new characters including Pyro, Siryn, and Colossus.

It had a much improved score by John Ottman, which instead of replacing the motif from the first film actually expands upon it and made it more epic. The use of Dies Irae during the attack on the White House was particularly good, as well as showing most of that scene from the POV of the Secret Service. Nightcrawler was excellent in this scene.

There is good allegory to being a mutant is like being gay (or whatever), and it made a good point about not having to permanently stay looking “normal.”

It had one of the coolest jailbreak scenes put to film, as well as Wolverine having a berserker rage.

There are some nice easter eggs for longtime readers, it fixed Storm’s hair/accent issues from the first film as well as expanding her role, and had a great teaser for the Phoenix Saga at the end leaving me wanting to see the next one right away.

The script was good enough that it made us almost start rooting for the villain, and it had just the right amount of action in it. It was adapted from a graphic novel called God Loves, Man Kills.

 


What went wrong:

There was a distinct lack of Cyclops in the film, and Nightcrawler’s interaction with his mom was a bit weird if you knew.

There are a few things that the writer/director didn’t quite think all the way through (because dealing with superpowers opens up a can of worms) such as Iceman being able to help Jean at the end, or what happened to the kids Colossus helped after Wolverine took the car and escaped, or the fact that Wolverine should have been able to smell that it was Raven and not Jean in the tent.

Cracking the neck as shorthand for healing factor is kinda cliché, and Rogue’s continued inability to use a seatbelt properly was a little silly, but most of these things are pretty minor.

 

What I would have changed:

Had something about Iceman and Storm trying to help Jean in the last scene but say something to the effect that it was just too much water to freeze/control all at once.

Maybe add one more scene with Cyclops evading capture and sneaking around before finally being caught and controlled, and I would have thrown in a structure collapse preventing escape from the dam at the end that he has to blast through to give him a little more to do.

 

 


X3: The Last Stand (2006)

 

The Buildup: 

With two successful X-Men and Spider-Man films each in the books, the anticipation for round three was even bigger. However, unbeknownst to the general public, there was a lot of background studio drama that severely affected how this film turned out involving executive Tom Rothman’s pissing match with Marvel Comics’ Ike Perlmutter.

 

The Plot: 

Jean comes back from the dead tremendously powered up, and Magneto intends to use her as a weapon. Meanwhile, a scientist has developed a cure for mutants, which has caused a rift in mutantkind. The X-Men deal with both problems when they collide together, as well as dissent from within after the death of Professor X and Cyclops.

 

 

What went right: 

Storm, Colossus, Iceman, and Shadowcat all got more action. The Danger Room finally made an appearance, along with the Fastball Special and Sentinels. Iceman finally iced up all the way. Kelsey Grammer nailed his role as Beast, and some of the chess themes continued.

 

What went wrong: 

A lot, and a significant chunk of it can be put at the feet of Tom Rothman, a Fox executive who had been embarrassed by Bryan Singer’s success with the previous films. Their pissing contest led to Singer’s firing and James Marsden’s and John Ottman’s departures. What was left was a mishmash of a script combining ideas for what was to be (I assume) the third and fourth movies together. They combined the Cure story with the Dark Phoenix (and skipped right over the first part of the Phoenix saga) while giving neither story the time to develop properly. The Dark Phoenix saga is the clearly bigger and more well-known story, but it took a back seat to the Cure, and turned Jean into Stephen King’s Carrie, Alcatraz edition. Because both stories were happening simultaneously, it required cross-country teleportation to make any sense.

The new production also brought along with it a bloated cast with a director who didn’t know how to do an ensemble movie in the same way that, say, the Russo Brothers could have done. I also noticed that there is a lot more yelling in this film between the X-Men. Maybe a reflection of how the production was going?

Callisto is given a combination of Caliban and Quicksilver’s powers. I’m not against new characters, but there are so many to draw from there’s no need to just make shit up. Apparently there’s a girl with purple hair that is called Psylocke, but she’s never mentioned by name, does anything, or says more than 3 words. Why include her? Also, their take on the Juggernaut was marginal at best, but what makes it worse is the inclusion of internet meme culture for a cheap laugh (“I’m the Juggernaut, bitch!”).

Angel’s story might as well not have happened as he never really did anything that impacted the characters or story, and he felt “tacked on” for the sake of having a founding team member represented in the movie. It seemed like parts of the movie were there for shock value (like Xavier dying out of nowhere) and others were there because the script template said there had to be an action scene every five pages.

While I liked Ellen Page as Kitty Pryde, she is now the third actress to portray her, which makes it seem like there wasn’t a lot of forethought put into casting during the last two films. In other words, I wish it had been her in all three movies. Though there was one bad part with her – when she was escaping with Leech she should have fully expected to go through the wall, but instead braced for impact because it wasn’t a CGI wall like the others. And we suddenly get a “power level” system that isn’t explained at all, making it seem more like technobabble from a sci-fi movie.

Finally, the post-credit scene is vital for future movies but it wasn’t well advertised to watch past the credits so I think most people still don't know about it.

 

What I would have changed:

So much. But the major things would be to keep Bryan Singer on as director, and make the Cure story the main plot point, with Jean’s resurrection and transformation into the “good” Phoenix part of the development, then save the Dark Phoenix story for the 4th movie. Keep Xavier and Cyclops alive.